Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 09:09:48 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote:
> James Cloos wrote:
>> When you first psoted this list I noticed som
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 09:09:48 Petteri Räty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote:
> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote:
> >>> James Cloos wrote:
> When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live
> >>
James Cloos wrote:
>> "Petteri" == Petteri Räty writes:
>
> Petteri> Their maintainers should be active and switch their ebuilds to
> Petteri> EAPI 2. If they don't have an active maintainer, then do we
> Petteri> want to keep live ebuilds for them around?
>
> What possible benefit could be
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> James Cloos wrote:
When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live
ebuilds. Git- is the one I remember.
Those should
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:07:02 Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote:
> > James Cloos wrote:
> > > When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live
> > > ebuilds. Git- is the one I remember.
> > >
> > > Those should not get nuked during
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200
Petteri Räty wrote:
> James Cloos wrote:
> > When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live
> > ebuilds. Git- is the one I remember.
> >
> > Those should not get nuked during global cleanups, as they are likely to
> > be in active use no
> "Petteri" == Petteri Räty writes:
Petteri> Their maintainers should be active and switch their ebuilds to
Petteri> EAPI 2. If they don't have an active maintainer, then do we
Petteri> want to keep live ebuilds for them around?
What possible benefit could be had from dropping ebuilds for n
James Cloos wrote:
> When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live
> ebuilds. Git- is the one I remember.
>
> Those should not get nuked during global cleanups, as they are likely to
> be in active use notwithstanding their keywording or masking.
>
> -JimC
Their maintain
When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live
ebuilds. Git- is the one I remember.
Those should not get nuked during global cleanups, as they are likely to
be in active use notwithstanding their keywording or masking.
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
Petteri Räty wrote:
> I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
> keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
> neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script
> and the list of ebuilds is attached. I plan on removing all t
10 matches
Mail list logo
