On 08/01/2014 05:35, Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 08/01/2014 04:52, Raúl Porcel wrote:
Indeed! The thing was that a lot of the packages were keyworded and
marked stable back in the day where the arch was more popular.
But almost all arches except amd64/x86/arm are getting less and less
popular:
On 07/26/14 19:33, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
remove themselves from it and say so?
Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't have to file
stable requests for that
On 08/01/2014 04:52, Raúl Porcel wrote:
On 07/26/14 19:33, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
remove themselves from it and say so?
Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't
Raúl Porcel posted on Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:52:21 +0200 as excerpted:
But almost all arches except amd64/x86/arm are getting less and less
popular:
alpha: no new hardware in more than 8+ years
hppa: being phased out IIRC, and no new workstations
(ie, graphics/sound) in 5+ years
ia64: no new
On 07/27/2014 02:20 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
I know I'm replying to my own message, but I do have a concern about
this that I want to ask about.
When a stable request is filed for a package, it is filed for all
architectures which have the ~arch keyword for the package and are
marked
On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
remove themselves from it and say so?
Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't have to file
stable requests for that arch on future versions of the package?
