On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 10:46:28 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Instead, we should come up with a clear set of rules under what
> circumstances package maintainers are allowed to stabilise ebuilds
> themselves on all architectures.
The cases where stabilisation is important (for security, progress) a
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 10:46 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Now what problem are we trying to solve? As I see it, it is mainly
> one of manpower, namely that some arch teams cannot keep up with
> stable requests, and I doubt that any technical solution will help
> to solve this. Introducing a "noarc
El dom, 19-01-2014 a las 10:46 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> > On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > El dom, 19-01-2014 a las 03:36 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> >> you mean * ? this already works today (at least with portage):
> >> KEYWORDS="~*"
> >> KEYWORDS="*"
>
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 19-01-2014 a las 03:36 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió:
>> you mean * ? this already works today (at least with portage):
>> KEYWORDS="~*"
>> KEYWORDS="*"
Currently not allowed by policy:
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/ind
