Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we have process names and stdout / stderr indication to more efficiently parse build logs? (was: Re: rfc: escape sequences in logs)

2013-09-05 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 04:54:46 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Kent Fredric posted on Wed, 04 Sep 2013 23:38:40 +1200 as excerpted: I see. I have a few gvim instances also reading/writing to that terminal I didn't know about, interesting. Which brings up the privacy point.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Can we have process names and stdout / stderr indication to more efficiently parse build logs? (was: Re: rfc: escape sequences in logs)

2013-09-04 Thread Duncan
Kent Fredric posted on Wed, 04 Sep 2013 23:38:40 +1200 as excerpted: I see. I have a few gvim instances also reading/writing to that terminal I didn't know about, interesting. Which brings up the privacy point. Anything getting this fancy and convoluted in terms of implementation is going to