Quoting Greg KH (2013-03-11 22:19:55)
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined,
> > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license
> > agreement and an option to also sign an a
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 12. März 2013, 00:12:43 schrieb Rich Freeman:
>> So, clarification now that I'm back at a keyboard...
>>
>> DCO is mandatory, and is simply a declaration that the committer has
>> checked and the new code is distributed unde
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 12. März 2013, 00:12:43 schrieb Rich Freeman:
>> So, clarification now that I'm back at a keyboard...
>>
>> DCO is mandatory, and is simply a declaration that the committer has
>> checked and the new code is distributed und
Am Dienstag, 12. März 2013, 00:12:43 schrieb Rich Freeman:
> So, clarification now that I'm back at a keyboard...
>
> DCO is mandatory, and is simply a declaration that the committer has
> checked and the new code is distributed under the license chosen for
> the project (see original email for de
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:12:43PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > No change intended. This is what happens when you send a thirty second
> > follow-up to a policy formed over two weeks, and then step away to eat...
>
> So, clarification now t
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> No change intended. This is what happens when you send a thirty second
> follow-up to a policy formed over two weeks, and then step away to eat...
So, clarification now that I'm back at a keyboard...
DCO is mandatory, and is simply a declara
On Mar 11, 2013 6:22 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined,
> > > which includes a mandatory requirement
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined,
> > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license
> > agreement and an option to
On Monday 11 of March 2013 14:19:55 Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined,
> > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license
> > agreement and an option to also s
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined,
> which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license
> agreement and an option to also sign an assignment-like document based
> on the FSFe FLA,
10 matches
Mail list logo
