Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I implemented this feature in Entropy long time ago (2009 iirc) and enabled it by default as well. We never had a single issue. Users seem quite happy about it. So yeah, go for it! -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
make.conf(5) man page: This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that have not been modified since they were installed. +1 very good idea The best thing about it is not having to worry about missing an important change in a file I DO change, due to all the noise

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Eray Aslan
On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: make.conf(5) man page: This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that have not been modified since they were installed. +1 very good idea Hmm, does that mean that when a default changes in (or some new setting is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 16-05-2012 12:36:03 +0300, Eray Aslan wrote: On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: make.conf(5) man page: This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that have not been modified since they were installed. +1 very good idea Hmm, does that mean

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 16-05-2012 a las 11:42 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió: On 16-05-2012 12:36:03 +0300, Eray Aslan wrote: On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: make.conf(5) man page: This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that have not been modified since

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org wrote: On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: make.conf(5) man page:   This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that   have not been modified since they were installed. +1 very good idea Hmm,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Eray Aslan
On 2012-05-16 12:56 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: Generally, several PMS (I think apt does it as well) make this assumption: if config file C owned by package P has never been modified, meaning that md5 or whatever is the same, the old C of P was fine, so is the new C. Yep, and I always thought

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 16-05-2012 11:48:20 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: El mié, 16-05-2012 a las 11:42 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió: On 16-05-2012 12:36:03 +0300, Eray Aslan wrote: On 2012-05-16 12:13 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: make.conf(5) man page: This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I implemented this feature in Entropy long time ago (2009 iirc) and enabled it by default as well. We never had a single issue. Users seem quite happy about it. This is also the default behavior with the cfg-update

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Enable FEATURES=config-protect-if-modified by default?

2012-05-15 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 15 May 2012 15:24:53 -0700 as excerpted: Hi, In case you aren't familiar with it, here's the description from the make.conf(5) man page: This causes the CONFIG_PROTECT behavior to be skipped for files that have not been modified since they were installed.