Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gratuitous useflaggery (doc and examples)

2006-03-05 Thread Patrick Börjesson
On 2006-03-04 20:47, Ferris McCormick uttered these thoughts: On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, MIkey wrote: Ferris McCormick wrote: I misinterpreted what you wrote. I thought you meant physically included in the package, not installed from a binary package. I just completely read what looks like

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gratuitous useflaggery (doc and examples)

2006-03-05 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 14:16 +0100, Patrick Börjesson wrote: [snip] It seems that INSTALL_MASK works only at merge time, so that if you build a package at one machine (with INSTALL_MASK set to f.ex. /usr/share/doc) and install it on the same machine, you get the expected behaviour. But the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gratuitous useflaggery (doc and examples)

2006-03-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 04 March 2006 13:18, MIkey wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:04:11 -0600 MIkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | At my job we aim to eventually rid ourselves completely of MS | products on several thousand (local and remote) desktops and replace | them with some

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gratuitous useflaggery (doc and examples)

2006-03-04 Thread MIkey
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:04:11 -0600 MIkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | At my job we aim to eventually rid ourselves completely of MS | products on several thousand (local and remote) desktops and replace | them with some sort of thin linux client running the citrix

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gratuitous useflaggery (doc and examples)

2006-03-04 Thread Ferris McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, MIkey wrote: Ferris McCormick wrote: I misinterpreted what you wrote. I thought you meant physically included in the package, not installed from a binary package. I just completely read what looks like a reasonable request

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gratuitous useflaggery (doc and examples)

2006-03-04 Thread Duncan
MIkey posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:18:22 -0600: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:04:11 -0600 MIkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | At my job we aim to eventually rid ourselves completely of MS | products on several thousand (local and remote)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gratuitous useflaggery (doc and examples)

2006-03-04 Thread Thomas de Grenier de Latour
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:18:22 -0600, MIkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can it exclude things from being included in binary packages? AFAIK, no. But what you could use (with portage-2.1) is a hook function in /etc/portage/bashrc: post_src_install() { rm -rf ${D}usr/share/doc ; } This way, files

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gratuitous useflaggery (doc and examples)

2006-03-04 Thread Simon Stelling
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: post_src_install() { rm -rf ${D}usr/share/doc ; } This way, files will be deleted for real, before getting merged or added to your binary package. No, that function never gets executed with binary packages. You probably meant post_pkg_preinst. -- Kind

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gratuitous useflaggery (doc and examples)

2006-03-04 Thread Thomas de Grenier de Latour
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 23:04:22 +0100, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: post_src_install() { rm -rf ${D}usr/share/doc ; } This way, files will be deleted for real, before getting merged or added to your binary package. No, that function never