Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 22 May 2011 16:52:55 -0400 Jonathan Callen a...@gentoo.org wrote: Here's the updated news item, which I will be committing very shortly. Please note that there is absolutely no version of portage that was not in package.mask that would have problems with an EAPI-2 atom in a news item

[gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-22 Thread Jonathan Callen
Here's the updated news item, which I will be committing very shortly. Please note that there is absolutely no version of portage that was not in package.mask that would have problems with an EAPI-2 atom in a news item because EAPI-2 support was added to portage at the same time as news item

[gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-19 Thread Jonathan Callen
Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote: Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix] I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific features) are allowed here. The GLEP does not make any meantion as to whether it is legal to use USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-19 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Jonathan Callen schrieb am 19.05.11 um 11:49 Uhr: Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote: Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix] I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific features) are allowed here. The GLEP does not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-19 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Jonathan Callen a...@gentoo.org wrote: Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote: Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix] I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific features) are allowed here. The GLEP