[gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-23 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Monday 08 March 2010 03:17:57 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:52:50 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Hello I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1] I splitted every desktop/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-13 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Friday 12 March 2010 19:39:48 Ben de Groot wrote: On 12 March 2010 10:48, Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: First of all, I'll delay the commit since I need to write documentation patches, and I won't be able, as I'll leave soon for a conference and will be back on Monday.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-13 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 16:47 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: Even so, if we choose not to implement the split now, there are problems that need addressing in the current situation. The Qt team finds the mysql dependency that was added to the desktop profile three months ago (see bug #291996)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-13 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 11:48 +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: I found your proposal about mixing profiles awesome, and I am willing to work on this. In fact, I'm going to raise the issue on KDE's meeting this Thursday at 20:00 UTC. Any freedesktop team members will be welcome there. But I'm not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-12 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:20 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go! I suggest reading my comments... Unless I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Friday 12 March 2010 10:36:57 Mart Raudsepp wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:20 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to

[gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-12 Thread Duncan
Ben de Groot posted on Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:47:13 +0100 as excerpted: * Making it harder to get both GNOME and KDE things out of a profile (though the common things in desktop profile right now is quite suboptimal for GNOME) Either solution is suboptimal, so it is very much about weighing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-12 Thread Ben de Groot
On 12 March 2010 10:48, Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: First of all, I'll delay the commit since I need to write documentation patches, and I won't be able, as I'll leave soon for a conference and will be back on Monday. What exactly needs to be done for documentation? Maybe I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-11 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: On 8 March 2010 02:17, Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: I attached the news item, please review. Meanwhile, I'll create docs patches. Also, I'm CCing hardened as my No.1 question was not answered. Please do. Thanks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-11 Thread Ben de Groot
On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go! I suggest reading my comments... Unless I missed something, you didn't make any comments on this thread. If

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-10 Thread Ben de Groot
On 8 March 2010 02:17, Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: I attached the news item, please review. Meanwhile, I'll create docs patches. Also, I'm CCing hardened as my No.1 question was not answered. Please do. Thanks Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to

[gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-07 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:52:50 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Hello I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1] I splitted every desktop/ folder i found. The following issues raised though: 1) I didn't

[gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Duncan
Zeerak Mustafa Waseem posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:59:39 +0100 as excerpted: How about the Handbook? As far as I remember you're asked to choose a profile :-) I can file a bug it needs to be done :-) Just let me know That's part 1 (installing), chapter 6 (base system), section 6.b.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Friday 05 March 2010 21:01:09 Duncan wrote: Zeerak Mustafa Waseem posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:59:39 +0100 as excerpted: How about the Handbook? As far as I remember you're asked to choose a profile :-) I can file a bug it needs to be done :-) Just let me know That's part 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-05 Thread Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:01:09PM +, Duncan wrote: Zeerak Mustafa Waseem posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:59:39 +0100 as excerpted: How about the Handbook? As far as I remember you're asked to choose a profile :-) I can file a bug it needs to be done :-) Just let me know That's part 1

[gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-04 Thread Duncan
Theo Chatzimichos posted on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:52:50 +0200 as excerpted: For example, I don't really like the firefox flag in kde, and I'd suggest a -firefox (ugly, I know) in kde's make.defaults That's not particularly practical, unfortunately. konqueror seems to be dropping behind,