[gentoo-dev] Re: alternatives.eclass and ecompress

2007-02-05 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sunday 04 February 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > > > Fine. If I have a slotted package, every slot having > > > > ${PN}.foo-${SLOT}.1.gz and I want people to be able to call `ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: alternatives.eclass and ecompress

2007-02-05 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:07:57 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ulrich Mueller) wrote: | What if the user specifies some other compression program in | PORTAGE_COMPRESS? Then they deserve whatever they get. Really, this is getting rather silly. The cost far outweighs the gain of providing the illusion of ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: alternatives.eclass and ecompress

2007-02-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 05 February 2007, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > alternatives.eclass is called from pkg_postinst() or pkg_postrm() then that sucks ... that's beyond my help -mike pgp7xVo8i1kND.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: alternatives.eclass and ecompress

2007-02-05 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> But my question is, WHY I shouldn't symlink to compressed man >> pages. > uhh, because you dont know what the compressed man page is ? > what's wrong with doing `dosym foo.1 /usr/share/man/man1/boo.1` and > letting ecompressdir fix the links ?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: alternatives.eclass and ecompress

2007-02-05 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2007, Mike Kelly wrote: > You could look at eselect-vi[1] for how it handles this case, > specifically the set_man_symlink() function. > [1] > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/eselect/trunk/modules/vi.eselect?view=markup Hm, this looks like it will only handle gzip and b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: alternatives.eclass and ecompress

2007-02-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 04 February 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > > Fine. If I have a slotted package, every slot having > > > ${PN}.foo-${SLOT}.1.gz and I want people to be able to call `man > > > ${PN}`, how should that be done? > > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: alternatives.eclass and ecompress

2007-02-04 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > Fine. If I have a slotted package, every slot having > > ${PN}.foo-${SLOT}.1.gz and I want people to be able to call `man > > ${PN}`, how should that be done? > You could look at eselect-vi[1] for how it handles this case, > speci

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: alternatives.eclass and ecompress

2007-02-04 Thread Mike Kelly
Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Fine. If I have a slotted package, every slot having > ${PN}.foo-${SLOT}.1.gz and I want people to be able to call `man > ${PN}`, how should that be done? You could look at eselect-vi[1] for how it handles this case, specifically the set_man_symlink() function. [1]

[gentoo-dev] Re: alternatives.eclass and ecompress

2007-02-04 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Saturday 03 February 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > The new ecompress allows compression of manpages in bz2, if I am > > right. > it allows any compression; it's up to the user ... so you cant assume > any extension That's my point. > > So now >