On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are
a lot as I have seen running:
grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v
eutils
Maybe they should be checked and a repoman
On 05/23/2012 11:11 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are
a lot as I have seen running:
grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v
eutils
On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:09:14 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/23/2012 11:11 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are
a lot as I have seen running:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:02:37 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't see how removing an inherit is breaking an eclass' API.
The way eclasses are defined, the eclasses it inherits are itself part
of its API. You can think of it using the lousy OO analogy that gave
eclasses their
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:02:05 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:02:37 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't see how removing an inherit is breaking an eclass' API.
The way eclasses are defined, the eclasses it inherits are
El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 06:39 +1000, Michael escribió:
On 2012-05-22 03:46, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133r2=1.134
Relying on
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 06:39 +1000, Michael escribió:
On 2012-05-22 03:46, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 10:31 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 06:39 +1000, Michael escribió:
On 2012-05-22 03:46, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer
On 05/23/2012 01:00 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 10:31 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 06:39 +1000, Michael escribió:
On 2012-05-22 03:46, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On May 20,
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:28:13 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 22.5.2012 8.53, Michał Górny wrote:
Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
remove eutils from autotools. Now, a
On 2012-05-22 03:46, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133r2=1.134
Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible
idea,
11 matches
Mail list logo
