[gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-02-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 01:41:00 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 06:15:32 -0500 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Are there any issues with changing the product/component on existing bugs? I could see things turn into keyword requests which didn't start out

[gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-02-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 06:15:32 -0500 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: If we added a Keyword/Stable Request component to the Gentoo Linux product we could also have it dependent on that, so only bugs in that component

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-02-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: If we added a Keyword/Stable Request component to the Gentoo Linux product we could also have it dependent on that, so only bugs in that component would display the flags. You'd need to include security bugs as well at the

[gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-01-31 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:02:01 +0100 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: A lot clearer than a single text field littered with keywords would be some tick boxes, indeed. In fact, it makes me wonder why we use a half-obscured list in a select field for adding/removing arch teams now.