-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/12 06:15 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
Pardon the belated response; responding to emails that are quick
where possible, but lagging on -dev. Missed this one however...
No worries, there's a lot going on.. :D
yngwin has a point that
On 30/09/12 06:15 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
yngwin has a point that I've not seen addressed.
What /is/ wrong with the whole CDEPEND intermediate var idea?
The problem appears as we introduce more DEPEND variables
(which is what prompted the proposal, IIRC). If we have
ADEPEND, BDEPEND,
Pardon the belated response; responding to emails that are quick where
possible, but lagging on -dev. Missed this one however...
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:16:02AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 19/09/12 09:09 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Brian Harring posted on Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:15:18 -0700 as excerpted:
The point I'm trying to make here is that each dep phase should be
authorative; in doing so, you start getting a lot of potential subsets
(DEPEND is a subset of TDEPEND, TDEPEND isn't completely, but mostly a
subset of
Ben de Groot posted on Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:22:06 +0800 as excerpted:
On 16 September 2012 21:15, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
So... basically, people are already doing this manually with their own
intermediate vars.
And this works fine, so it doesn't warrant a cosmetic change.
On 09/19/2012 06:59 AM, Duncan wrote:
Ben de Groot posted on Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:22:06 +0800 as excerpted:
On 16 September 2012 21:15, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
So... basically, people are already doing this manually with their own
intermediate vars.
And this works fine, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 19/09/12 09:09 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 09/19/2012 06:59 AM, Duncan wrote:
Ben de Groot posted on Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:22:06 +0800 as
excerpted:
On 16 September 2012 21:15, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com
wrote:
So... basically,
