Daniel, answering you in this mail... Yes, probably sometimes we have to
discuss basic things in this mailing list but since developers do this
basic errors we have to. Technical problems in our portage tree are
perfectly valid for this mailing list.
В Пнд, 05/01/2009 в 13:55 +0530, Nirbheek
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Torsten Veller ml...@veller.net wrote:
* Patrick Lauer (patrick) patr...@gentoo.org:
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/memdump/memdump-1.0.1.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
Daniel Black dragonhe...@gentoo.org said:
I'm not sure I want to see this list being a QA list for commits.
If there is a commit that raises an interesting question for everyone sure
put
it here.
Otherwise please take up QA faults with the author or devrel if you think
they
are
I'm not sure I want to see this list being a QA list for commits.
If there is a commit that raises an interesting question for everyone sure put
it here.
Otherwise please take up QA faults with the author or devrel if you think they
are consistantly under-standard.
just my 2c.
--
Daniel
* Patrick Lauer (patrick) patr...@gentoo.org:
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/memdump/memdump-1.0.1.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/memdump/memdump-1.0.1.ebuild?rev=1.1content-type=text/plain
