Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.13 news item?

2011-02-09 Thread Francesco R
2011/2/9 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:52:55 +0100 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: It seems that with glibc-2.13 there are some serious compatibility issues. There are good warnings on the planet (http://psykil.livejournal.com/340806.html), but not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.13 news item?

2011-02-09 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:32:36 +0100 Francesco R viv...@gmail.com wrote: Since the upgrade I do get portage emerging text files .sh, .conf and such as file of the exact same size but filled of \0, luckily most upgrade fails. I've seen similar issue in bug #353907 [1] but there they blame

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.13 news item?

2011-02-09 Thread Francesco R
2011/2/9 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:32:36 +0100 Francesco R viv...@gmail.com wrote: Since the upgrade I do get portage emerging text files .sh, .conf and such as file of the exact same size but filled of \0, luckily most upgrade fails. I've seen similar issue

[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.13 news item?

2011-02-09 Thread Duncan
Francesco R posted on Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:32:36 +0100 as excerpted: 2011/2/9 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:52:55 +0100 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: It seems that with glibc-2.13 there are some serious compatibility issues. [H]ow about creating

[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.13 news item?

2011-02-08 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:52:55 +0100 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: It seems that with glibc-2.13 there are some serious compatibility issues. There are good warnings on the planet (http://psykil.livejournal.com/340806.html), but not every ~arch user reads the planet, so how