On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 05:52:20PM -0500, Matthias Maier wrote
> (A-C) gcc-5.4.0 and gcc-4.9.4 are slotted separately. What is going to
> be the default is entirely up to you.
Good to hear. Like I said, on a fresh install I'd go with the current
version (5.4). But for now, I'll wait for other
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017, at 17:17 CDT, "Walter Dnes" wrote:
> ...fun !NOT. If you're doing a fresh install, ***WITH A GCC5-BUILT
> INSTALL CD AND STAGE 3***, then yes, go for it. But changing horses in
> mid-stream can be painfull. Would it hurt to stay with 4.9.4 for the
> time being, assuming
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 20.04.2017 kell 18:17, kirjutas Walter Dnes:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:36:03AM +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote
> >
> > The default is new:
> > https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2015-10-22-gcc-5-new-c++1
> > 1-abi.html
>
> And the news item says...
>
> > Display-If-Ins
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:36:03AM +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote
>
> The default is new:
> https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2015-10-22-gcc-5-new-c++11-abi.html
And the news item says...
> Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5
...which means that people like me, who currently have 4.9.4,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > It is stable. Even there are open bugs, arches started stabilizing it.
>
> Is gcc-5.4.0 built "--with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible"?
> On the Pale Moon linux sub-forum, there were crashing issues with the
> contributed Ubuntu buil
> It is stable. Even there are open bugs, arches started stabilizing it.
Is gcc-5.4.0 built "--with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible"?
On the Pale Moon linux sub-forum, there were crashing issues with the
contributed Ubuntu build when Ubuntu switched to gcc 5. The maintainer
of the Ubuntu
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Jörg Schaible <
joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> Tomas Mozes wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> > joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
> >> https://
Tomas Mozes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1
>>
>> However, after synching the tree, thi
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Jörg Schaible <
joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> Tomas Mozes wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> > joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64
On 18/04/17 10:44, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, T, 18.04.2017 kell 11:16, kirjutas Jörg Schaible:
>> Hi Tomas,
>>
>> Tomas Mozes wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
>>> joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
>>>
Hi,
according the logs, gcc 4.5
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 18.04.2017 kell 11:16, kirjutas Jörg Schaible:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> Tomas Mozes wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> > joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
> > > https:
Hi Tomas,
Tomas Mozes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1
>>
>> However, after synching th
12 matches
Mail list logo