On 07-09-2012 13:51:24 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 07/09/12 01:13 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 06-09-2012 09:25:53 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
#1 - there is both a specification, and an initial
implementation, AND a fork of the tree that is kept
semi-up-to-date on my dev overlay.
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:17:17 +0200
Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
Eh, no. Now it just always breaks when you perform a downgrade, and
revdev-rebuild or @preserved-libs won't help you. I prefer that you
give best practices how to use sub-slots to make Portage also able to
do a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/12 02:17 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
No, not a GLEP, per se. I'm trying to understand what sub-slot
does and is. I think I'm starting to understand now. However, for
this feature to be added to an EAPI, IMO it would be nice if there
On 07-09-2012 19:21:57 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:17:17 +0200
Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
Eh, no. Now it just always breaks when you perform a downgrade, and
revdev-rebuild or @preserved-libs won't help you. I prefer that you
give best practices how
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:49:35 +0200
Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07-09-2012 19:21:57 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:17:17 +0200
Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
Eh, no. Now it just always breaks when you perform a downgrade,
and revdev-rebuild
On 07-09-2012 14:39:38 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
I guess maybe i'm not following your example. To spell it out better,
here's what I'm understanding:
bar-1.0 has (prior to slot-operators) an RDEPEND=app-cat/libfnord.
No version specified. As such, it'll build successfully against
On 09/07/2012 11:17 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
No, not a GLEP, per se. I'm trying to understand what sub-slot does and
is. I think I'm starting to understand now. However, for this feature
to be added to an EAPI, IMO it would be nice if there are resources that
make it for most developers
On 07-09-2012 19:55:53 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
It appears slot-operator-deps do have some resemblance with ABI here
(especially if :* would be written in PMS such that it only allows
upgrades, no downgrades), but sub-slots are completely unrelated.
Downgrades are a different,
On 07-09-2012 12:03:16 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/07/2012 11:17 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
I guess real-life examples, more extensively described than you did
before, with exactly where it goes wrong, and how the situation is
improved would help.
Perhaps some of the greatest
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:25:22 +0200
Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
I like that! Kudos for making it work!
I just wonder what the heck that has to do with SLOT.
The correct fix for not needing to rebuild stuff is to SLOT libraries
like crazy, and have a SLOT per
On 07-09-2012 20:36:02 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The correct fix for not needing to rebuild stuff is to SLOT libraries
like crazy, and have a SLOT per thing-we-don't-call-ABI. This then
needs := dependencies, so that packages can say and remember which
SLOT I was built against.
However,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/12 03:25 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 07-09-2012 12:03:16 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/07/2012 11:17 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
I guess real-life examples, more extensively described than you
did before, with exactly where it goes
12 matches
Mail list logo
