Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-09 Thread James Cloos
Sven == Sven Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JimC There are many more ebuilds than just hal which fail with a JimC compressed pci.ids file. Sven Oh! Really? Which ones? I didn't keep a list, but Ryan's post lists some packages I remember having had problems. -JimC -- James Cloos [EMAIL

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-02 Thread James Cloos
Sven == Sven Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sven Oh! So USE=hal forces pciutils not to use zlib? There are many more ebuilds than just hal which fail with a compressed pci.ids file. And many of them are non-obvious. It took me more than I little bit of effort after the zlib USE flag was

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-02 Thread Steve Long
James Cloos wrote: The pciutils ebuild should be re-engineered to use separate USE flags for linking to libz and compressing the database. ++ It may be what upstream (pciutils) do by default, but no other distro ships with compressed ids for the reasons you outline (and you can't mmap the file).

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-02 Thread Sven Köhler
There are many more ebuilds than just hal which fail with a compressed pci.ids file. And many of them are non-obvious. It took me more than I little bit of effort after the zlib USE flag was first added to the pciutils ebuild to figure out why so many packages where failing... Oh! Really?

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-02 Thread Ryan Hill
Sven Köhler wrote: There are many more ebuilds than just hal which fail with a compressed pci.ids file. And many of them are non-obvious. It took me more than I little bit of effort after the zlib USE flag was first added to the pciutils ebuild to figure out why so many packages where

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-02 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:19:02PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: Oh! Really? Which ones? app-laptop/smcinit app-misc/ddccontrol sys-apps/hwsetup sys-apps/{lib,}kudzu sys-apps/vbetool sys-boot/efibootmgr sys-power/athcool are some we have on file so far. So it seems, there are many many

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-02 Thread Ryan Hill
Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:19:02PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: Oh! Really? Which ones? app-laptop/smcinit app-misc/ddccontrol sys-apps/hwsetup sys-apps/{lib,}kudzu sys-apps/vbetool sys-boot/efibootmgr sys-power/athcool are some we have on file so far. So it seems,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-02 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 14:15 +0100, Steve Long wrote: James Cloos wrote: The pciutils ebuild should be re-engineered to use separate USE flags for linking to libz and compressing the database. ++ It may be what upstream (pciutils) do by default, but no other distro ships with compressed ids

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-08-02 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 08:23 -0400, James Cloos wrote: There are many more ebuilds than just hal which fail with a compressed pci.ids file. And many of them are non-obvious. It took me more than I little bit of effort after the zlib USE flag was first added to the pciutils ebuild to figure

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-07-29 Thread Sven Köhler
Why did you provocate this breakage? This is not a good idea, IMHO. No. And many gave up getting this sensible again. As is, the default USE flags for a desktop profile lead to a compilation failure when unattended due to this, which is very very bad. I'm not even complaining about that.

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-07-29 Thread Sven Köhler
Why did you provocate this breakage? Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here. That is with USE=hal. Crap... Oh! So USE=hal forces pciutils not to use zlib? And so the check, which the hal ebuild performs, should be modified to check for USE=hal rather than for USE=!zlib ?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-07-29 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 2007-07-29 20:03:55 Sven Köhler napisał(a): Why did you provocate this breakage? Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here. That is with USE=hal. Crap... Oh! So USE=hal forces pciutils not to use zlib? And so the check,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-07-29 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
Sven Köhler wrote: Why did you provocate this breakage? Which breakage? It didn't install a gzipped pci.ids here. That is with USE=hal. Crap... Oh! So USE=hal forces pciutils not to use zlib? And so the check, which the hal ebuild performs, should be modified to check for USE=hal rather

[gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86

2007-07-29 Thread Ryan Hill
Wulf C. Krueger wrote: Why did you provocate this breakage? This is not a good idea, IMHO. I think so, too. cf. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166790 That has got to be one of the stupidest bug reports i've ever seen. -- dirtyepicyou'd be tossed up or wash up, the narrator