[gentoo-dev] Slimming down the portage tree [WAS: Assigning bugs to treecleaners]

2006-06-27 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Raphael Marichez [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week, every month, and it doesn't really suit for the very little systems (embedded linux) nowadays. Furthermore, with the old 2.0-portage, the syncing and caching had become really

Re: [gentoo-dev] Slimming down the portage tree [WAS: Assigning bugs to treecleaners]

2006-06-27 Thread Alec Warner
Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Raphael Marichez [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week, every month, and it doesn't really suit for the very little systems (embedded linux) nowadays. Furthermore, with the old 2.0-portage, the syncing and