Ken wrote:
> I may just be a lowly Arch Tester, but I don't necessarily see why
> individual dev's who are bothered by the noise can't just set up their
> own killfiles and filters.
Do you have a solution to filter flamefests out of a ml? If you do,
please share it with the list.
signature.asc
Thomas Tuttle wrote:
> Questions? Comments?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Thomas Tuttle
How about no moderation at all? If you are going to go through the mess
of deciding what is a good post or spam, why not just go all the way and
set up a global blacklist.
The blacklist could be set up to say only last
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:46:56 -0400
"Thomas Tuttle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Questions? Comments?
How about NO MODERATION?
Or better yet, self-moderation? I will start doing that right now, and
stop feeding this thread. Yay! :)
Kind regards,
JeR
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Thomas Tuttle wrote:
> The only people eligible to moderate are devs in the whitelisted state.
>
> Questions? Comments?
I like it.
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:46:56PM -0400, Thomas Tuttle wrote:
> Questions? Comments?
You're going to have a hell of a fun time to answer the question of
how a post is judged "good" or "spam".
OG.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Okay, I thought of a potential modification that might make this a
little more friendly. Moderate all non-dev posts by default, but pass
their posts after a certain time period if nobody checks the queue, and
put a few people in charge of whitelisting positive contributors. If
whitelisted posters
