Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-05-22 Thread Beber [Gentoo]
Hi Xorg 6.8.99.5 really works good. I've see that 6.8.99.7 have been released in CVS. Did you make some test ? [ Also, I've made some ebuilds dor XCB, if you are interested : http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93582 ] See Ya Beber, On 4/19/05, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-05-22 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Beber [Gentoo] wrote: Xorg 6.8.99.5 really works good. I've see that 6.8.99.7 have been released in CVS. Did you make some test ? No, not yet. But bumping them is pretty trivial and low priority. I do it when I get around to it. [ Also, I've made

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-21 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 23:11, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Paul de Vrieze wrote: Any indication on the stability of the snapshots. I'm eager to try out all the new sugar, but do want to keep a somewhat stable system. No guarantees one way or the other, but I'm using it as my regular X. And

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-21 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul de Vrieze wrote: I've found a bug (and reverted) in the matrox driver. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-20 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: Some people have experienced font slowdowns. This is because of a /usr/share/fonts/fonts circular symlink that's a migration artifact. I just committed a fix for it, but feel free to simply delete

[gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I just added a couple of new xorg-x11 ebuilds. 6.8.2-r2 is a work in progress and will soon be removed from package.mask and unleashed upon the masses. 6.8.99.3 is a development snapshot of CVS HEAD and is part of an occasionally released series

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-19 Thread Sebastian Bergmann
Donnie Berkholz wrote: 6.8.99.3 is a development snapshot of CVS HEAD and is part of an occasionally released series (roughly every two weeks). Is there a list of major changes for X.Org 6.9.0 (or whatever release 6.8.99.* is leading to) somewhere? How far do you estimate this release to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-19 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 10:00, Donnie Berkholz wrote: I just added a couple of new xorg-x11 ebuilds. 6.8.2-r2 is a work in progress and will soon be removed from package.mask and unleashed upon the masses. 6.8.99.3 is a development snapshot of CVS HEAD and is part of an occasionally released

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-19 Thread Stefan Schweizer
On 4/19/05, Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any indication on the stability of the snapshots. I'm eager to try out all the new sugar, but do want to keep a somewhat stable system. works for 5 hours without problems on my system now :) regards, Stefan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul de Vrieze wrote: Any indication on the stability of the snapshots. I'm eager to try out all the new sugar, but do want to keep a somewhat stable system. No guarantees one way or the other, but I'm using it as my regular X. And unless the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Goller wrote: do you want both on one bug or seperate bugs, from your email, you do want success and problems on bugs.g.o, correct? do you want hardware info/binary drivers used added? Basically emerge info and xorg.conf, from which I can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some new xorg ebuilds

2005-04-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: Some people have experienced font slowdowns. This is because of a /usr/share/fonts/fonts circular symlink that's a migration artifact. I just committed a fix for it, but feel free to simply delete the symlink rather than