Sorry I had to lighten things up a bit
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:53:54 PM EST Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:15:07 +0100 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Every other day on IRC, I see people arguing about touching each
> > others packages, despite
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:53:54 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:15:07 +0100 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
[...]
> > (Sometimes it's even
> > me who's doing the touching!) My instinctive reaction is always,
> > "can't everybody calm down and be happy somebody is doing your work
> >
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:15:07 +0100 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Every other day on IRC, I see people arguing about touching each
> others packages, despite our policies against it.
We don't have policies against it, we do have the policy regulating
it. See section "Touching
On Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:15:07 AM EDT Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Every other day on IRC, I see people arguing about touching each
> others packages, despite our policies against it. (Sometimes it's even
> me who's doing the touching!) My instinctive reaction is always,
>
Le jeudi 03 novembre 2016 à 11:15 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> Hey guys,
>
> Every other day on IRC, I see people arguing about touching each
> others packages, despite our policies against it. (Sometimes it's
> even
> me who's doing the touching!) My instinctive reaction is always,
>
Hey guys,
Every other day on IRC, I see people arguing about touching each
others packages, despite our policies against it. (Sometimes it's even
me who's doing the touching!) My instinctive reaction is always,
"can't everybody calm down and be happy somebody is doing your work
for you?" The
