On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 18:19 +0100, John Mylchreest wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 17:31 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Actually, genkernel does have the --callback option, which runs an
> > external command before finalizing the build. We use it for building
> > external modules and packages t
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 17:31 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Actually, genkernel does have the --callback option, which runs an
> external command before finalizing the build. We use it for building
> external modules and packages that require a configured kernel when
> building the releases, but
On Wednesday 19 of October 2005 20:56 Herbert G. Fischer wrote:
> Perhaps the modules-update could be extended to detect new kernels and warn
> users or automatically update modules. This could also be documented in
> Gentoo docs since this is a basic and common problem that almost every
> Gentoo u
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 21:44 +0100, John Mylchreest wrote:
> I don't particular feel comfortable doing this. the only place I can
> actually see this being of some use is with the pkg_config since an
> ebuild postinst is far too soon, and patching up Kbuild to do this is
> far too intrusive (let alo
> 2005/10/19, Herbert G. Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Perhaps the modules-update could be extended to detect new
> kernels and warn users or automatically update modules. This
> could also be documented in Gentoo docs since this is a basic
> and common problem tha
Oops... sorry for the last e-mail. I confess that I did not read your
code-piece before answering. It's exactly what I had in mind (as you
saw).2005/10/19, Herbert G. Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Perhaps the modules-update could be extended to detect new kernels and
warn users or automatically upda
Perhaps the modules-update could be extended to detect new kernels and
warn users or automatically update modules. This could also be
documented in Gentoo docs since this is a basic and common problem that
almost every Gentoo user may have.
Thanks for the patch!2005/10/19, John Myers <[EMAIL PROTE
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 06:36, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:32:19AM -0200, Herbert G. Fischer wrote:
[snip]
> > - Patch kernel's "make" to warn at the end of "make modules_install"
[snip]
> I think you should check out sys-kernel/module-rebuild
Actually, a combinati
That's cool.2005/10/19, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:32:19AM -0200, Herbert G. Fischer wrote:> There could be some way to remember users what installed packages need to be> reemerged after a new kernel is installed.>> I thought in this ideas:
>> - Patch kerne
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:32:19AM -0200, Herbert G. Fischer wrote:
> There could be some way to remember users what installed packages need to be
> reemerged after a new kernel is installed.
>
> I thought in this ideas:
>
> - Patch kernel's "make" to warn at the end of "make modules_install"
> -
There could be some way to remember users what installed packages need to be reemerged after a new kernel is installed.
I thought in this ideas:
- Patch kernel's "make" to warn at the end of "make modules_install"
- Warn user after any boot (during init.d stage). This script should
detect the new
11 matches
Mail list logo
