On Monday 30 October 2006 10:26, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
A single person doesn't constitute a team [1]. More than one person
does...
[1] Unless you're SpanKY.
You forget that vapier also works with SpanKY ;)
--
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking)
--
On 10/28/06, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'd go further and question the whole herd concept.
It also gives users the impression that there is an entire team of
people maintaining a package,when in fact it might be just one or two
people.
-Richard
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:46:30 -0400
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I request that this tag be made optional in the metadata.xml DTD.
While ideally it is beneficial to have every package in a herd, in
practice this doesn't occur.
22:28 @omp $ herdstat -pq no-herd | wc -l
22:28 @omp
On Saturday 28 October 2006 22:43, Marius Mauch wrote:
Well, I'd go further and question the whole herd concept. What benefits
do we actually gain by having herds? For the most part it's just a
way to associate a package with a mail alias, but for that I don't
really see the need for this
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:00:04 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 28 October 2006 22:43, Marius Mauch wrote:
Well, I'd go further and question the whole herd concept. What
benefits do we actually gain by having herds? For the most part
it's just a way to associate a
On Sunday 29 October 2006 01:26, Marius Mauch wrote:
So if now you're on a herd alias but not listed in herds.xml for a herd,
what practical difference does it make if the herd exists or not?
huh ?
-mike
pgpmO3uG0vGTB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 29 October 2006 01:26, Marius Mauch wrote:
So if now you're on a herd alias but not listed in herds.xml for a herd,
what practical difference does it make if the herd exists or not?
huh ?
-mike
I think one of his points is that you still get the bugmail...I
