Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-05 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 04 February 2010 16:37:01 Tiziano Müller wrote: >> While some people already discovered the upstream metadata tags, there >> are only 8 ebuilds using them so far. Mostly I am to blame for that, >> since I forgot to send out a prop

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-05 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 11:34 +0100 schrieb Alexis Ballier: > > Other sites I'd like to add: > > - pypi > > - google-code > > - ctan ... if someone can identify a key for packages > > I don't know what you exactly mean by a key, but for ctan the > catalogue [1,2] may be what you're looking for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-05 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 20:16 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov: > В Чтв, 04/02/2010 в 22:37 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет: > > The upstream tags are meant as a way to track information about > > - id of a hosting or indexing site (automated version bump checks) > > Does there exist any scripts for thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-05 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 04/02/2010 в 22:37 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет: > The upstream tags are meant as a way to track information about > - id of a hosting or indexing site (automated version bump checks) Does there exist any scripts for this? -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-05 Thread Alexis Ballier
> Other sites I'd like to add: > - pypi > - google-code > - ctan ... if someone can identify a key for packages I don't know what you exactly mean by a key, but for ctan the catalogue [1,2] may be what you're looking for. If I understood correctly, a key would be $PN and the relevant information f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 04 February 2010 16:37:01 Tiziano Müller wrote: > While some people already discovered the upstream metadata tags, there > are only 8 ebuilds using them so far. Mostly I am to blame for that, > since I forgot to send out a proper announcement. While all the required > information can be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 22:37 +0100 schrieb Tiziano Müller: > While some people already discovered the upstream metadata tags, there > are only 8 ebuilds using them so far. Mostly I am to blame for that, > since I forgot to send out a proper announcement. While all the required > information

[gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
While some people already discovered the upstream metadata tags, there are only 8 ebuilds using them so far. Mostly I am to blame for that, since I forgot to send out a proper announcement. While all the required information can be found in the Developer Handbook [1], here is a short summary: The