On Monday 01 August 2005 10:22 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 01 August 2005 10:15 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:59 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > > - x86/linux24 (deprecated)
> > > - x86/linux26 (deprecated)
> >
> > What should we do with deprecated profiles? Should
On Jul 31, 2005, at 9:11 AM, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I especially need to know which profiles are valid for projects
like embedded, hardened, and *bsd.
Here is the state of macos profiles:
Valid:
default-darwin/
- macos/10.3
- macos/10.4
- macos/progressive
Deprecated:
default-macos/*
On Monday 01 August 2005 16:46, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 20:21 +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 July 2005 16:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid
> > > profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 20:21 +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> On Sunday 31 July 2005 16:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid
> > profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone
> > stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list o
On Monday 01 August 2005 10:15 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:59 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > - x86/linux24 (deprecated)
> > - x86/linux26 (deprecated)
>
> What should we do with deprecated profiles? Should we still be checking
> against them?
>
> I would think we would, but
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:59 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> - x86/linux24 (deprecated)
> - x86/linux26 (deprecated)
What should we do with deprecated profiles? Should we still be checking
against them?
I would think we would, but what do the rest of you think?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering
On Sunday 31 July 2005 16:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid
> profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone
> stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or
> not. I have a pretty good idea of what is v
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:11 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid
> profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone
> stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or
> not. I have a pretty good idea o
ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid
profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone
stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or
not. I have a pretty good idea of what is valid under default-linux,
as far as the default profil
