Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake + ninja vs autotools

2017-11-16 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:17:52 -0700 Christoph Junghans wrote: > > > Ninja doesn't support Fortran as well. > Besides not supporting the full feature set. That does not seem to be effecting meson. Which only supports ninja. A considerable amount of projects are switching to meson, look around. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake + ninja vs autotools

2017-11-16 Thread Christoph Junghans
2017-11-16 6:44 GMT-07:00 Christoph Junghans : > > > On Nov 16, 2017 6:29 AM, "Brian Evans" wrote: > > On 11/15/2017 10:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> It maybe worth considering switching the default generator in the >> cmake-utils.eclass from the default of emake to ninja. >> >> - : ${CM

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake + ninja vs autotools

2017-11-16 Thread Christoph Junghans
On Nov 16, 2017 6:29 AM, "Brian Evans" wrote: On 11/15/2017 10:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > It maybe worth considering switching the default generator in the > cmake-utils.eclass from the default of emake to ninja. > > - : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR:=emake} > + : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERA

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake + ninja vs autotools

2017-11-16 Thread Brian Evans
On 11/15/2017 10:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > It maybe worth considering switching the default generator in the > cmake-utils.eclass from the default of emake to ninja. > > - : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR:=emake} > + : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR:=ninja} > > For those with cmake ebuilds y

[gentoo-dev] cmake + ninja vs autotools

2017-11-15 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
It maybe worth considering switching the default generator in the cmake-utils.eclass from the default of emake to ninja. - : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR:=emake} + : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR:=ninja} For those with cmake ebuilds you can test this out now via CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR="ninja" inhe