Re: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors

2007-07-17 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:58:43PM -0700, Chrissy Fullam wrote: Developer Relations will continue to assist on requests and any extra bit that we can. We will see which way this ML thing takes Gentoo and offer our support in any way we can. Nice statement from a PR POV, but i really have

Re: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors

2007-07-17 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:41 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: So the way i read it devrel would like to do something if requested, but isn't supposed to enforce the CoC, nor has the authority? Considering that the Code of Conduct is a subset of the regular Gentoo developer policies that Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors

2007-07-17 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:09:58PM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: Considering that the Code of Conduct is a subset of the regular Gentoo developer policies that Developer Relations already enforces, I would say that they are definitely enforcing the CoC and have the authority. What DevRel

Re: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors

2007-07-16 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:11:56PM +0200, Timothy Redaelli wrote: I have always thought that proctors/COC is useless, I vote to remove it. Proctors have already been removed in the last council meeting. As far the CoC is concerned, i'm not sure what the current status is and if anyone is

Re: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors

2007-07-16 Thread Ferris McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:08:31 +0200 Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:11:56PM +0200, Timothy Redaelli wrote: I have always thought that proctors/COC is useless, I vote to remove it. Proctors have already been

RE: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors

2007-07-16 Thread Chrissy Fullam
Ferris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far the CoC is concerned, i'm not sure what the current status is and if anyone is supposed to enforce it atm (devrel? userrel?). I am sure not devrel. That's one reason we had proctors to begin with.

Re: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors

2007-07-15 Thread Timothy Redaelli
Alle domenica 15 luglio 2007, Ferris McCormick ha scritto: Here's one I should sleep on -- I didn't: Not much. Very few Comments. I'll start them. 1. Council is just wrong. They are also just gone. 2. I am just wrong. Most likely. 3. Council blew it. They ignore what

Re: [gentoo-dev] council and proctors

2007-07-15 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
3. Council blew it. They ignore what proctors were doing, killed COC, and punted.. ++ Poor job or rather interests conflict. On 7/15/07, Ferris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here's one I should sleep on -- I didn't: Not much. Very few