Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
Hello,
I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
/etc/conf.d too that should be fixed.
Regards,
Petter
signature.asc
On Monday 09 April 2007 05:39:29 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 08 April 2007, Marcelo Góes wrote:
As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is
doenvd was written specifically to replace `insinto /etc/env.d`
Does it make sense to allow both styles?
not really
Is it worth
On Monday 09 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
/etc/conf.d too that should be fixed.
yep
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 09 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
/etc/conf.d too that
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 09 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
Hello,
I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is
1) cleaner and easier to read
2) more portable (for systems that use something other than
/etc/env.d, for example)
On Sunday 08 April 2007, Marcelo Góes wrote:
As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is
doenvd was written specifically to replace `insinto /etc/env.d`
Does it make sense to allow both styles?
not really
Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd?
yes please
-mike
