Attached is a draft of a glep for formalizing multiple-repository support
This is far from ideal in many ways, but i'm too tired and I drank too
much caffine to be sane.
Also, i have no clue how to use docutils so i just tried my best.
(** is my way of doing another level of bullets, please
I apologize for the caps in the subject.
Andrew Muraco
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Pardon bluntness; don't mean offense, just specifically picking the
hell out of this proposal to make a point (lucky you) :)
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:17:44AM -0500, Andrew Muraco wrote:
Attached is a draft of a glep for formalizing multiple-repository support
I appreciate trying to chip in,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:25:58PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:15:48 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| True stand alone repository capabilities aren't required/bound to
| glep42, all that's required out of glep42 is that the syncing repo id
| be used now
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:14:15 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| What remaining straw men are there for ignoring the portage
| developers requests?
Asking you to specify how multiple repositories will work before I try
to extend the GLEP to support multiple repositories is hardly a
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:59 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Do you need to know how every bit of a car works to drive it? No.
No, but I do need to know whether it has manual or automatic gears, and
where the steering wheel is.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:08:31AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:59 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Do you need to know how every bit of a car works to drive it? No.
No, but I do need to know whether it has manual or automatic gears, and
where the
