didn't he ask for people who know a particular application very well?
If you actually read the GLEP, you will note that there is a provision
to expand the idea to include herd testers.
i think there is a big difference between agreeing to test one
particular package since they know it very
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 09:48 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
didn't he ask for people who know a particular application very well?
If you actually read the GLEP, you will note that there is a provision
to expand the idea to include herd testers.
someone might like to help with testing one
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 09:36 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Eldad Zack wrote:
Hello,
Sometimes it becomes a problem whenever a new release or a tricky bugfix
comes
up for a certain package.
To improve QA we can let our userbase help, especially people who use
certain
packages
Daniel Goller wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 09:36 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Eldad Zack wrote:
Hello,
Sometimes it becomes a problem whenever a new release or a tricky bugfix comes
up for a certain package.
To improve QA we can let our userbase help, especially people who use
On Tue, 2006-11-04 at 19:35 -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
Isn't this why we already have the arch tester position as described by
GLEP 41 (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0041.html)?
Furthermore, are you saying that users would enroll themselves via this
hypothetical web
