hasufell schrieb:
When I sum that up again...
- we are on gentoo and need as much information as possible for
backtracing, resolving bugs, checking whether CFLAGS and such have been
respected
- no need to tell the user to recompile with
EXTRA_ECONF=--disable-silent-rules or similar just to
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:24:12 +0200
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
hasufell schrieb:
When I sum that up again...
- we are on gentoo and need as much information as possible for
backtracing, resolving bugs, checking whether CFLAGS and such have
been respected
-
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:08:10 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:24:12 +0200
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote:
hasufell schrieb:
When I sum that up again...
- we are on gentoo and need as much information as possible for
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:18 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2012 06:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:13:43 +0200 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and
On 08/04/2012 09:03 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
FFS, do not spam base-system yet again with stuff that's in the
process of being discussed still. Additionally, this is something that
should be fixed on the EAPI/eclass level and NOT per package. Putting
EXTRA_ECONF=--disable-silent-rules in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2012 06:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:13:43 +0200 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing
verbose build log for that which was approved:
On 03/08/2012 16:18, hasufell wrote:
So that would simply mean we add that information to the devmanual?
Should I open a bug with a devmanual patch then?
Please do. QA will back the request for verbose logs by default.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu —
We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing verbose
build log for that which was approved:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml
Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384193 and
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:13 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
- if people want nice build _output_ (not log), they can use --quiet-build
++
If you're going to spam the console with 10k lines of text, what's the
harm in spamming it with 100k? I realize the odd package has a fairly
quiet
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:13:43 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing
verbose build log for that which was approved:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml
Also we have bug
+1 for verbosity
Il giorno 01/ago/2012 13:21, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org ha scritto:
We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing verbose
build log for that which was approved:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml
Also we have
On 08/01/2012 11:27 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:13 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
- if people want nice build _output_ (not log), they can use --quiet-build
++
If you're going to spam the console with 10k lines of text, what's the
harm in spamming it with
12 matches
Mail list logo
