we added the cld workaround to gcc-4.3.0+ in early 2008 until packages sorted
themselves out. i think they have at this point. in terms of kernels, we're
talking about ones around 2.6.25 and earlier.
i'll be dropping it from our gcc builds, so now is the time to make noise if
this affects
so... is this something where I should suddenly in a moment of clarity shout
ah, that cld workaround ?!
On Samstag 20 August 2011 20:03:04 Mike Frysinger wrote:
we added the cld workaround to gcc-4.3.0+ in early 2008 until packages
sorted themselves out. i think they have at this point. in
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
so... is this something where I should suddenly in a moment of clarity shout
ah, that cld workaround ?!
On Samstag 20 August 2011 20:03:04 Mike Frysinger wrote:
we added the cld workaround to gcc-4.3.0+ in early
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:08:00 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
so... is this something where I should suddenly in a moment of clarity
shout ah, that cld workaround ?!
if you dont know immediately what i was referring to, then chances are you
dont care :)
otherwise, Matt provided good info
