On 03/15/12 at 08:11PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:28:03 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > Seems that nobody has announced it yet:
> >
> > The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
> > ago. New news items should be committed to git only, beca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/15/2012 07:49 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>>> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git
>>> some time ago. New news items should be committed to git only,
>>> because the master
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some
>> time ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because
>> the master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any more.
> Is there a link to the repository anywhere?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
> ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because the
> master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any more.
>
Is there a link to the repository anywh
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:28:03 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Seems that nobody has announced it yet:
>
> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
> ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because the
> master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any
Seems that nobody has announced it yet:
The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because the
master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any more.
Especially, this concerns the news about udev unmasking that w
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Thursday 08 October 2009 13:57:40 Alex Alexander wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> Some devs have complained about the directory structure in the
>>> gentoo-news being too complicated. News item files are curren
> On Thu, 08 Oct 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I was planning to ask this already but now is a good time too. Last
> time we tried to remove a news item the client broke. Has the client
> since been fixed and in stable long enough to presume that most
> users have upgraded?
The news module in e
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:29:25 +0300
Petteri Räty wrote:
> I was planning to ask this already but now is a good time too. Last
> time we tried to remove a news item the client broke. Has the client
> since been fixed and in stable long enough to presume that most users
> have upgraded?
No (under ce
Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:07, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Crowded? I don't think so :)
>> The number of news items is quite small, so I think we can afford having them
>> all in the same folder
>
> I'm assuming devs will eventually pick this feature up and use it more often
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:07, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Crowded? I don't think so :)
> The number of news items is quite small, so I think we can afford having them
> all in the same folder
I'm assuming devs will eventually pick this feature up and use it more often :)
But yeah, as long as someon
On Thursday 08 October 2009 13:57:40 Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > Opinions?
>
> Sounds good, although it could get a bit crowded if we remove /,
> unless we remove really old items (like >= 2 years old).
>
Crowded? I don't think so :)
The nu
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Opinions?
Sounds good, although it could get a bit crowded if we remove /,
unless we remove really old items (like >= 2 years old).
--
Alex || wired
Some devs have complained about the directory structure in the
gentoo-news being too complicated. News item files are currently found
in a third-level subdirectory:
/MM/-MM-DD-itemname/
On the rsync side the year and month subdirs are absent:
metadata/news/-MM-DD-itemname/
Aft
14 matches
Mail list logo
