On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Maxim Kammerer m...@dee.su wrote:
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
flatfile lookups are 2-4ms with hot cache. How much faster is the db
option?
I guess it depends on the implementation and how close is the system's
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
You realize that files are cached in RAM right?
Yes, I know how operating systems work.
More than likely those pages are always in cache.
Did you read my reply at all? You are assuming ideal conditions
(enough free RAM),
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Maxim Kammerer m...@dee.su wrote:
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
You realize that files are cached in RAM right?
Yes, I know how operating systems work.
More than likely those pages are always in cache.
Did you read
On Monday 31 December 2012 18:23:06 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 30 December 2012 13:47:40 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they
worked:
On Saturday 29 December 2012 20:24:16 Mike Frysinger wrote:
rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into
a USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which
means it'd default to off.
sounds like people can handle this, so i've added it to 2.17
On Sunday 30 December 2012 13:47:40 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
because i suspect it's dead weight for most people, especially desktop
users.
Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they
worked:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday 30 December 2012 13:47:40 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they
worked: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432020
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Maxim Kammerer m...@dee.su wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday 30 December 2012 13:47:40 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they
worked:
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
flatfile lookups are 2-4ms with hot cache. How much faster is the db
option?
I guess it depends on the implementation and how close is the system's
operational situation to an ideal one (whether swap started thrashing,
etc.).
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/30/2012 02:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ?
I use it for some pam_ldap machines
... it'd default to off.
fine with me, I'll turn it on / need it for `ls -l /home`
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into a
USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which means
it'd default to off.
-mike
To be fair, in my large enterprise
On 30/12/2012 02:24, Mike Frysinger wrote:
rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into a
USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which means
it'd default to off.
I use it on my servers, but I'm fine with turning it on myself.
You still
On Sunday 30 December 2012 03:46:01 Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it
into a USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd
which means it'd
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
because i suspect it's dead weight for most people, especially desktop users.
Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they worked:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432020
rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into a
USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which means
it'd default to off.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 12/30/2012 02:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ?
I use it for some pam_ldap machines
... it'd default to off.
fine with me, I'll turn it on / need it for `ls -l /home` not taking ages.
--
Michael Weber
Gentoo Developer
web: https://xmw.de/
On 12/29/12 5:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into a
USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which means
it'd default to off.
If you want, you can still enable the nscd USE flag in the profile so it
is
17 matches
Mail list logo
