On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Why not checkpath -d -o fowner:fgroup -m 0755 /var/run/foo?
i thought there was something. that was the whole point of Bug
192682. if we dont get openrc out the door, i'll have to add to
baselayout-1.
I thought you already had backported
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Why not checkpath -d -o fowner:fgroup -m 0755 /var/run/foo?
i thought there was something. that was the whole point of Bug
192682. if we dont get openrc out the door, i'll have to add to
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eray Aslan wrote:
It will be somewhat more work but instead of the above, we can say tmpfs
might be used for /var/run and /var/lock and the init scripts should handle
this correctly. It feels (for want of
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
for people who do wish to improve their init.d scripts, recreating a
dir is easy if your init.d runs after localmount:
[ ! -d /var/run/foo ] install -d -m 755 -o fowner -g fgroup /var/run/foo
oh, and for the very few cases that need to
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:40:31 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On 08/12/2010 09:48 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
It says Files under this directory, not Files and directories
under this directory.
Fair enough.
So our
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Mike Frysinger wrote:
for people who do wish to improve their init.d scripts, recreating a
dir is easy if your init.d runs after localmount:
[ ! -d /var/run/foo ] install -d -m 755 -o fowner -g fgroup /var/run/foo
Why not checkpath -d -o fowner:fgroup -m 0755
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Mike Frysinger wrote:
for people who do wish to improve their init.d scripts, recreating a
dir is easy if your init.d runs after localmount:
[ ! -d /var/run/foo ] install -d -m 755 -o fowner -g fgroup /var/run/foo
It is perfectly legal to clear /var/run across reboots. Below is a bug
from a user that ran into some trouble because an init script assumes that
/var/run/package/ exists for its PID file:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332397
A quick grep through the tree shows 73 packages that
On 8/12/10 11:29 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
It is perfectly legal to clear /var/run across reboots. Below is a bug
from a user that ran into some trouble because an init script assumes that
/var/run/package/ exists for its PID file:
Can we add a repoman check for that?
signature.asc
What you're saying doesn't agree with
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#VARRUNRUNTIMEVARIABLEDATA
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Eray Aslan eray.as...@caf.com.tr wrote:
It is perfectly legal to clear /var/run across reboots. Below is a bug
from a user that ran into some trouble
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:36:40PM -0400, Michael Sterrett wrote:
What you're saying doesn't agree with
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#VARRUNRUNTIMEVARIABLEDATA
I do not understand. In the above link, it says:
/var/run:
[...]Files under this directory must be cleared (removed or
On 08/12/2010 09:42 PM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:36:40PM -0400, Michael Sterrett wrote:
What you're saying doesn't agree with
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#VARRUNRUNTIMEVARIABLEDATA
I do not understand. In the above link, it says:
/var/run:
[...]Files
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:48:04 +0300, Samuli Suominen
ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
It says Files under this directory, not Files and directories under
this directory.
Oh, cmon. If you are going to selectively quote, then I'll give you
this: This directory contains system information data
On 08/12/2010 09:48 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
It says Files under this directory, not Files and directories under
this directory.
Fair enough.
So our policy basically is tmpfs is not supported for /var/run (and
also for /var/lock I suppose).
It will be somewhat more work but instead of
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On 08/12/2010 09:48 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
It says Files under this directory, not Files and directories under
this directory.
Fair enough.
So our policy basically is tmpfs is not supported for /var/run (and also
for /var/lock I
15 matches
Mail list logo
