Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml GLEP for review

2016-03-20 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:37:30 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe > > all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml GLEP for review

2016-03-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:37:30 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe > > all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:

[gentoo-dev] metadata.xml GLEP for review

2016-03-19 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, all. Long story short: while working on various metadata.xml-related aspects, it bite us pretty hard that we lack proper spec for metadata.xml file. What we have is pretty much the DTD, some partial GLEPs (that sometimes provide incorrect info) and random bugs. ml posts... Therefore, I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml GLEP for review

2016-03-19 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe > all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review: Sounds like a good idea! > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:68 I

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml GLEP for review

2016-03-18 Thread Johannes Huber
Am Mittwoch 16 März 2016, 19:43:21 schrieb Michał Górny: > Hello, all. > > Long story short: while working on various metadata.xml-related > aspects, it bite us pretty hard that we lack proper spec for > metadata.xml file. What we have is pretty much the DTD, some partial > GLEPs (that sometimes