On 07/02/2014 13:54, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-07-02, o godz. 10:44:16
[snip]
I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without
understanding most of the current profiles. And I'm afraid there are
only few people who have any idea about the current profile
structure...
On 07/03/2014 08:18 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 07/02/2014 13:54, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-07-02, o godz. 10:44:16
[snip]
I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without
understanding most of the current profiles. And I'm afraid there are
only few people who have any
Dnia 2014-07-03, o godz. 02:18:23
Joshua Kinard ku...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
[...]
And so on. The goal was to have profiles/ be extremely flat, with limited
nesting only for categorization purposes. Each component would contain all
of the information specific to that component, and rely on
On 07/03/2014 03:32, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-07-03, o godz. 02:18:23
Joshua Kinard ku...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
[...]
And so on. The goal was to have profiles/ be extremely flat, with limited
nesting only for categorization purposes. Each component would contain all
of the
On 07/03/2014 03:00, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On 07/03/2014 08:18 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 07/02/2014 13:54, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-07-02, o godz. 10:44:16
[snip]
I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without
understanding most of the current profiles.
Am Mittwoch 02 Juli 2014, 15:07:12 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
I don't know how to get from here to there. The problem isn't just
constructing an alternative profile tree. We could even have
/usr/portage/profiles-r2 and switch between the two on demand. The
problem is there's a lot of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/07/14 04:47 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 07/03/2014 03:00, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On 07/03/2014 08:18 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
On 07/02/2014 13:54, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-07-02, o godz. 10:44:16
[snip]
I don't feel like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:41:03 -0400
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
I've talked to the funtoo devs a few times about stealing their
profile idea. A few things need to be done to make this happen,
mainly eselect, catalyst, and
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Did the Funtoo devs tell you that they don't run repoman because of the
explosive set of possible combinations that flavors mix-ins introduce?
Having it run over them should be easy; but having it run within a
reasonable
All,
I'm moving to a new thread since the discussion has moved away from just
a sub profile for no-multilib.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:30:50AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch 25 Juni 2014, 15:11:40
Dnia 2014-07-02, o godz. 10:44:16
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
All,
I'm moving to a new thread since the discussion has moved away from just
a sub profile for no-multilib.
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:30:50AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:01 PM,
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without
understanding most of the current profiles. And I'm afraid there are
only few people who have any idea about the current profile
structure...
No argument
On 07/02/14 14:10, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without
understanding most of the current profiles. And I'm afraid there are
only few people who have any idea about the current
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
Shallow profiles avoid this. Also features avoid this (the
closest thing we have to mix-ins) provided they operate on a set of
flags/packages orthogonal to the rest of the stack. You then have shallow
base and you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2014 02:10 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without
understanding most of the current profiles. And I'm afraid there are
On 07/02/14 14:41, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2014 02:10 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without
understanding most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2014 03:07 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/02/14 14:41, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2014 02:10 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/02/2014 03:07 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
I don't know how to get from here to there. The problem isn't just
constructing an alternative profile tree. We could even have
/usr/portage/profiles-r2 and
18 matches
Mail list logo
