Le 17/08/2011 21:57, Matthew Summers a écrit :
> +1 on this. It saves the ebuild for posterity AND prevents users
> hitting nasty bits. This seems to me to beg for a proper well-defined
> policy, in any case.
>
We already have a policy for this and it's called portage.
If a package is broken (an
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 19:45, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm forking from a thread on gentoo-project:
>>
>> On 17:26 Wed 17 Aug 2011, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> Personally, I want to shrink portage. There is no way for 250 listed
>>
Am 17.08.2011 18:45, schrieb Thomas Kahle:
> Hi,
>
> I'm forking from a thread on gentoo-project:
>
> On 17:26 Wed 17 Aug 2011, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Personally, I want to shrink portage. There is no way for 250 listed
>> developers ( I would be glad if 100 of us were really active ) to
>> ma
most users just hunt the program name and gentoo to a searchengine
they get the info that the ebuild is in cvs but in graveyard.
but hey i am just a user.
Mario
2011/8/17 Markos Chandras :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 17/08/2011 06:04 ??, Mario Fetka wrote:
>> how a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 17/08/2011 05:56 ??, Alex Alexander wrote:
> We could try removing all keywords and masking ebuilds that are
> abandoned with bugs but upstream is still active, instead of
> removing them completely. That way the ebuild will be there when/if
> so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Is there a way for X to easily query the portage history and dig up
> the ebuild that was there at some point. She could then use the old
> ebuild for their new version, but without efficient search she would
> probably start fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 17/08/2011 06:04 ??, Mario Fetka wrote:
> how about adding a new tag metadata,xml so that it is not imported
> into the rsync tree
>
What is the difference between your proposal and removing the package?
In both cases, the broken ebuild does not
how about adding a new tag metadata,xml so that it is not imported
into the rsync tree
Mario
2011/8/17 Alex Alexander :
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 19:45, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm forking from a thread on gentoo-project:
>>
>> On 17:26 Wed 17 Aug 2011, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> Person
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 19:45, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm forking from a thread on gentoo-project:
>
> On 17:26 Wed 17 Aug 2011, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Personally, I want to shrink portage. There is no way for 250 listed
>> developers ( I would be glad if 100 of us were really active ) t
Hi,
I'm forking from a thread on gentoo-project:
On 17:26 Wed 17 Aug 2011, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Personally, I want to shrink portage. There is no way for 250 listed
> developers ( I would be glad if 100 of us were really active ) to
> maintain thousands of ebuilds.
[...]
> We need to suppor
10 matches
Mail list logo
