On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:42:25AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
Hola all.
Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
arch.list
categories
use.desc
use.local.desc
package.mask
updates
Addition to this list: thirdpartymirrors .
~harring
pgpvIGSGfwz7G.pgp
Description:
On 08/29/05 Brian Harring wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:57:37AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On 08/29/05 Brian Harring wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:17:39AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
Don't mind moving them, BUT
- metadata is a stupid location for them for several reasons
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:24 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
Aside from that, the parent implementation could stand a tweak or two.
Further, assuming metapkg goes through, virtual is obsoleted. The
inclusion of GRP_STAGE23_USE also bugs me a bit; yes it works right
now, but what happens when
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 01:03 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:42:25AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
Hola all.
Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
arch.list
categories
use.desc
use.local.desc
package.mask
updates
Addition to this
On 08/30/05 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 01:03 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:42:25AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
Hola all.
Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
arch.list
categories
use.desc
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 01:03 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:42:25AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
Hola all.
Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
arch.list
categories
use.desc
use.local.desc
package.mask
updates
On 08/27/05 Brian Harring wrote:
Hola all.
Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
arch.list
categories
use.desc
use.local.desc
package.mask
updates
be moved out of the profiles directory in the tree, and into the
existing metadata directory personally, due
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:17:39AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On 08/27/05 Brian Harring wrote:
Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
arch.list
categories
use.desc
use.local.desc
package.mask
updates
be moved out of the profiles directory in the tree,
On 08/29/05 Brian Harring wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:17:39AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
Don't mind moving them, BUT
- metadata is a stupid location for them for several reasons
being?
metadata already holds global repository information, time of
repositories generation,
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 03:42 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
Further, while no one has yet proposed anything concrete, people have
been after revamping the profile implementation. Quite likely if/when
this occurs, it's going to require a seperate directory to avoid any
issues with older portage
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:27:34PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This could still be done under profiles. Personally, I like the idea of
something more like this:
project/os/arch/version for profiles
This would give us something like this:
default/linux/x86/2006.0
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 15:36 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:27:34PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This could still be done under profiles. Personally, I like the idea of
something more like this:
project/os/arch/version for profiles
This would give us
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:48:20PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
What other changes are you guys thinking of regarding profiles?
That would be Marius's department. I'm not willing (personally) to
look at revamping profiles till rewrite is finished.
At that point, new profile's should be able
On 27/8/2005 10:42:25, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hola all.
Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
arch.list
categories
use.desc
use.local.desc
package.mask
updates
be moved out of the profiles directory in the tree
Not sure about package.mask.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 01:17:50PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On 27/8/2005 10:42:25, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hola all.
Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files-
arch.list
categories
use.desc
use.local.desc
package.mask
updates
be
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 01:32:33PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 01:17:50PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
Not sure about package.mask. I thought that was part of the profile,
as different profiles might package.mask separately. I know I use it
in /etc/profile to
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 06:38:36AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
You're masking occurs within the profile itself, not globally.
Global masking usually is for introduction of new ebuilds that need
testing and shouldn't be hit by normal arch testers (portage early
release candidates for
On 27/8/2005 13:34:15, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Rough filtering stack-
profiles/package.mask
/etc/make.profile/package.mask (incremental through subprofiles)
users package.mask, and users package.unmask
Ordered it in that fashion to show that it's effectively repository
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 03:29:32PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On 27/8/2005 13:34:15, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Rough filtering stack-
profiles/package.mask
/etc/make.profile/package.mask (incremental through subprofiles)
users package.mask, and users package.unmask
19 matches
Mail list logo
