Re: [gentoo-dev] upcoming mirror cleansing

2005-04-24 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:55:14PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 08:49:59AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote: Hola all. [snip] under 'Deletions for Sunday May 01 2005' unknown: portage-2.0.51.20.tar.bz2 sandbox-1.2.tar.bz2 Perhaps a major glitch here, since

Re: [gentoo-dev] upcoming mirror cleansing

2005-04-23 Thread Alin Nastac
Brian Harring wrote: Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be removed from the mirrors network. Either A) no ebuild claims that distfile. it's orphaned on our mirrors B) RESTRICT=fetch is set for the ebuild. We don't mirror those files. C) RESTRICT=mirror is set

Re: [gentoo-dev] upcoming mirror cleansing

2005-04-23 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:54:40PM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote: Brian Harring wrote: Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be removed from the mirrors network. Either A) no ebuild claims that distfile. it's orphaned on our mirrors B) RESTRICT=fetch is set for the

Re: [gentoo-dev] upcoming mirror cleansing

2005-04-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:49:59 -0500 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Why this matters- around 10,000 files out of 28,600 files will be | removed from the mirrors network. I just had a random thought. Have our GLEP 19 people thought about this at all? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] upcoming mirror cleansing

2005-04-23 Thread Daniel
Aside from that, kindly check the failed fetches on the list. If one of your ebuilds is in that list, either no valid URI could be found, or you doffed the SRC_URI for it (mirror:// w/out a mirror has been common). The following from the list report no valid uri although they WORKFORME.