Alle 13:50, sabato 24 dicembre 2005, Peter ha scritto:
Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against this
concept are devs, and the only people for it are users. Remember that
users are your customers. Every effort should be made to keep them happy.
As a user, I wouldn't
On Saturday 24 December 2005 13:50, Peter wrote:
Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against this
concept are devs, and the only people for it are users. Remember that
users are your customers. Every effort should be made to keep them happy.
Considering that we aren't
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 07:50:51AM -0500, Peter wrote:
Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against this
concept are devs, and the only people for it are users. Remember that
users are your customers. Every effort should be made to keep them happy.
customer
n
On Saturday 24 December 2005 13:50, Peter wrote:
Would you please add the comments to the bug report? Or, may I copy them?
Please advise.
Feel free to do so.
Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against this
concept are devs, and the only people for it are users.
On 12/24/05, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:09:36 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 12:34, Peter wrote:
THAT is a very reasonable comment!
Not at all. Meta ebuilds are a provisional and fugly workaround as long as
we have to wait for
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 07:50:51 -0500 Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against
| this concept are devs, and the only people for it are users. Remember
| that users are your customers. Every effort should be made to keep
| them happy.
Hardly
Peter wrote:
Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against this
concept are devs, and the only people for it are users.
Please see Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for those
using MUAs that suck, it's Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:16:53 -0600,
From: Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
I'm just a user, but I personally would prefer the three separate ebuilds. If a
meta-ebuild was included as an additional way to build, that'd be fine. I
update whenever a new version comes out, but only build -kernel after updating
the kernel. This makes sense as being the most efficient way to
