Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS

2012-07-27 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:44:47 -0400 Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: I would REALLY like to cut down on things like what I saw when I upgraded today: * Messages for package app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-20120520: You are looking for QA_FLAGS_IGNORED. -- Best

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS

2012-07-27 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/27/2012 02:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:44:47 -0400 Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: I would REALLY like to cut down on things like what I saw when I upgraded today: * Messages for package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS

2012-07-27 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il 26/07/2012 23:51, Michał Górny ha scritto: You are looking for QA_FLAGS_IGNORED. Actually I'd say QA_PREBUILT. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS

2012-07-26 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/23/2012 01:44 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il 23/07/2012 10:30, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto: Those are two very valid reasons why we can't add these to the profiles, but do you have any suggestions on how we can get more than just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS

2012-07-23 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/22/2012 08:44 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il 22/07/2012 14:38, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto: It would seem to me that we could get all these QA warning out of the way very quickly by adding -frecord-gcc-switches to the *FLAGS in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS

2012-07-23 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il 23/07/2012 10:30, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto: Those are two very valid reasons why we can't add these to the profiles, but do you have any suggestions on how we can get more than just yourself running this QA? Add it to the dev profile (I think we have one?) via bashrc, then we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS

2012-07-23 Thread Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/23/2012 01:44 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il 23/07/2012 10:30, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto: Those are two very valid reasons why we can't add these to the profiles, but do you have any suggestions on how we can get more than just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS

2012-07-22 Thread Zac Medico
On 07/22/2012 02:38 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: It would seem to me that we could get all these QA warning out of the way very quickly by adding -frecord-gcc-switches to the *FLAGS in the base profile (it appears to be platform agnostic but if I'm wrong we can add it for supported

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting ignored *FLAGS

2012-07-22 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il 22/07/2012 14:38, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina ha scritto: It would seem to me that we could get all these QA warning out of the way very quickly by adding -frecord-gcc-switches to the *FLAGS in the base profile (it appears to be platform agnostic but if I'm wrong we can add it for supported