Mike Frysinger wrote:
so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
-mike
I'd rather say that we select packages that evolve and fit the needs and
kill what isn't suitable anymore.
There are still many way to shoot
Chandler Carruth wrote:
As a user currently, what steps could I take to help this package stay
alive? I will take them as the alternative is to put an unofficial
ebuild up on a webpage.
On my to be killed list I have
transcode 1
avifile
transcode 1 is already there and seems in good
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:09:50AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
I'd rather say that we select packages that evolve and fit the needs and
kill what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
| a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
Quite a contrast with the x11 herd policy: to add packages until there's
10x more than you can
On Friday 09 December 2005 08:19 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:09:50AM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
I'd rather say that we
On 12/8/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another package is taking a long long way that goes out of portage.
I'm running out of openings for these mails, you know?
Oh well, media-video/dvdrip has many issues reported in bugzilla (some have
patches, most haven't), and
On 08/12/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another package is taking a long long way that goes out of portage.
I'm running out of openings for these mails, you know?
Alternative dvd-ripping software is present in portage, starting from mencoder
and its frontends, and they
On Thursday 08 December 2005 19:12, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
Er, isn't dvdrip the most popular ripping software on Linux?
Popular, maybe, but there're enough bug to make it a difficult task to
maintain.
Current versions are tested only on transcode 0.6 (I'm sure that at least the
versions that
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
If a new maintainer is found, fine, it can remain, but currently the
resources
of Video team are limited and we have enough problems to take care of without
dvdrip.
so the video herd policy is to remove packages
On Thursday 08 December 2005 21:10, Mike Frysinger wrote:
so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
No, it's to remove the packages that have problems, that requires dependencies
that are badly broken (transcode 0.6
On Thursday 08 December 2005 20:23, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Thursday 08 December 2005 21:10, Mike Frysinger wrote:
so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with
a small enough subset of packages you can handle ?
No, it's to remove the packages that have
I am not a gentoo developer, but a user, but I have submitted several
fixes for dvdrip in the past, and plan on continuing to use it, and get
it running and working in gentoo. I would be happy to maintain it, or
simply try to more responsively post fixes in the future to Bugzilla if
it would
12 matches
Mail list logo
