On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their
own packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off
of the arch teams.
Did that really happen or am I making it up? Is it written down
anywhere?
Sure it is. :)
08.01.2015 20:15, Michael Orlitzky пишет:
I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their own
packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off of the
arch teams.
Did that really happen or am I making it up? Is it written down anywhere?
amd64/x86 are major
On 01/08/2015 12:57 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
08.01.2015 20:15, Michael Orlitzky пишет:
I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their own
packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off of the
arch teams.
Did that really happen or am I making it up? Is
I'm going to write a devmanual patch but don't want to sound like a lunatic.
Also, an informal definition on what is supposed to be appropriate
hardware and userland (e.g. clean amd64 profile) and what are keywording
best practices would be nice to have. (Alternatively a link to the
On 01/08/2015 01:42 PM, Matthias Maier wrote:
I'm going to write a devmanual patch but don't want to sound like a lunatic.
Also, an informal definition on what is supposed to be appropriate
hardware and userland (e.g. clean amd64 profile) and what are keywording
best practices would be
08.01.2015 21:12, Michael Orlitzky пишет:
On 01/08/2015 12:57 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
08.01.2015 20:15, Michael Orlitzky пишет:
I vaguely remember a discussion about maintainers stabilizing their own
packages -- maybe just on x86 and amd64 -- to take the load off of the
arch teams.
Did
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:00:16 +0300
Mikle Kolyada zlog...@gentoo.org wrote:
Major arches are amd64 and x86, nothing more. There is a bug for it
already [1]
Isn't x86 basically a dead legacy arch by now?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
