On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
Feel the trend? gnome-base/gnome-panel will follow soon. Lets make this
global. Unless we decide that PolicyKit is the future and make it
compulsory).
If no one complains, I will make the changes in a couple days.
So,
Hi Zac,
On Thursday 19 March 2009 19:20:52 Zac Medico wrote:
Robert Piasek wrote:
I think it would be also good idea to add policykit support and finally
unmask it. It seems some packages have hardcoded --without-policy-kit /
--without- policykit and some others add policykit to
Hi,
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 13:12:45 Olivier Crête wrote:
Hello,
use.local.desc:app-admin/gnome-system-tools:policykit - Use
sys-auth/policykit to gain privileges to change configuration files
use.local.desc:app-admin/system-tools-backends:policykit - Use
sys-auth/policykit to gain
Le 19/03/2009 15:23, Robert Piasek a écrit :
Feel the trend? gnome-base/gnome-panel will follow soon. Lets make this
global. Unless we decide that PolicyKit is the future and make it
compulsory).
If no one complains, I will make the changes in a couple days.
That seems reasonable. ACK from
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le 19/03/2009 15:23, Robert Piasek a écrit :
Feel the trend? gnome-base/gnome-panel will follow soon. Lets make this
global. Unless we decide that PolicyKit is the future and make it
compulsory).
If no one complains, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Piasek wrote:
I think it would be also good idea to add policykit support and finally
unmask
it. It seems some packages have hardcoded --without-policy-kit / --without-
policykit and some others add policykit to package.use.mask (btw can
Le 19/03/2009 19:12, Doug Goldstein a écrit :
The problem would be a simple fix if PolicyKit supported groups and we
could just say give all access to those in the wheel group as a
reasonable default. But alas, it does not. Arguably we can probably
patch that in and just be done with it.
