On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:20:00 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
But if we look on tag of screen-4.0.3 or its release:
screen-4.0.2.tar.gz27-Jan-2004 05:46 821K
screen-4.0.2.tar.gz.sig27-Jan-2004 05:47 65
screen-4.0.3.tar.gz07-Aug-2008 06:30 821K
В Сбт, 07/11/2009 в 18:24 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет:
* Masking beta...
This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break previous
behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software should not be
masked (its TESTING for purpose, not stable).
God no! If we'll start to
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:24:10 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
* Masking beta...
This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break
previous behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software
should not be masked (its TESTING for purpose, not stable).
Also
Dne neděle 08 Listopad 2009 17:57:10 Jeroen Roovers napsal(a):
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 18:24:10 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
* Masking beta...
This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break
previous behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software
Hi all,
I'm not QA, but I'll go ahead and add my comments to this also.
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Tom Chv??tal wrote:
* Masking beta...
This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break previous
behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software