Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: isodate for packages.mask starting on 2019-07-01

2019-07-03 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 13:23:10 +0200 Jonas Stein wrote: > By the way, you can get a formatted string of now in UTC with: > date -u +"%Y-%m-%d" Or just: date -uI pgpiM0RFr3T2z.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: isodate for packages.mask starting on 2019-07-01

2019-06-29 Thread Jonas Stein
Hi Benda, thank you for your quick response. >> Change: >> I suggest that we start using the date format -mm-dd >> for all dates in packages.mask >> starting with 2019-07-01 > > For me isodate is more readable. I would vote for this change. Great. I know, that some people prefer their

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: isodate for packages.mask starting on 2019-07-01

2019-06-29 Thread Jonas Stein
Hi Michał, I see your argument with "Larry" as bad example user. I will not touch it for now. But we should think about it some day later because we have Larry as example user in many places already. I will put this in another RFC. >> * 2019-01-01 + 30 days is unclear, if we do not use UTC time

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: isodate for packages.mask starting on 2019-07-01

2019-06-29 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Jonas, Jonas Stein writes: > Dear all, > > Situation: > We have different date formats in packages.mask. > > Change: > I suggest that we start using the date format -mm-dd > for all dates in packages.mask > starting with 2019-07-01 For me isodate is more readable. I would vote for this

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: isodate for packages.mask starting on 2019-07-01

2019-06-29 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2019-06-29 at 13:23 +0200, Jonas Stein wrote: > Dear all, > > Situation: > We have different date formats in packages.mask. > > > Change: > I suggest that we start using the date format -mm-dd > for all dates in packages.mask > starting with 2019-07-01 > > The following changes in