On Wednesday 21 June 2006 10:58, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
ok; so in gtk-land we have gtk2 to prefer the newer interface whereas
the proposal for qt/qt3 is to have a specific flag for the older
interface. I do prefer the qt/qt3 approach, even though it's
inconsistent with what happens on gtk. I
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Why you ask? Because a user does not care if packageX uses qt3 or qt4, he
just wants to use it.
But why do we have two useflags then?
Because the user should be able to disable optional support for either qt3
or qt4 or both for every package.
There's a significant
Caleb Tennis wrote:
qt3 - enable optional qt3 support
qt4 - enable optional qt4 support
Maybe I just need a little time to warm up to this. :)
Caleb
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 15:44, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
qt3 and qt4 is being used there already and it is obvious
It's nice to invent new use flags affecting Qt stuff without contacting
those who care for Qt.
2) A package requires either Qt3 or Qt4 (both not both?...such as
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:20:47PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 15:44, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
qt3 - enable optional qt3 support
qt4 - enable optional qt4 support
That will be a mess to support in the long run.
Why?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
