On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 22:24 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
# Gen 2 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (`date`)
# Masked for testing.
=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver
Please people,
if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it.
Stuff with high impact better be masked for initial testing,
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:23:33 +0200
Dawid Węgliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's ok. ~arch isn't training ground. It's supposed to
work, so asking arch teams to keywords packages that are not supposed
to
Alec Warner schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:23:33 +0200
Dawid Węgliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's ok. ~arch isn't training ground. It's supposed to
work, so asking arch teams to keywords packages that
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Thomas Sachau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alec Warner schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:23:33 +0200
Dawid Węgliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's ok. ~arch isn't training ground.
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Gen 2 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (`date`)
# Masked for testing.
=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver
Please people,
if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it. If you
find that you cannot commit an ebuild
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Gen 2 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (`date`)
# Masked for testing.
=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver
Please people,
if you want to get something
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Gen 2 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (`date`)
# Masked for testing.
=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver
Please people,
if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it.If you find
that you cannot commit an ebuild because of
Alec Warner wrote:
If pmask is not for testing...what is it for?
UT GOTY and nvidia-drivers, of course!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:56:39 -0700
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If pmask is not for testing...what is it for?
The name says it all - to prevent people from automatically emerging
stuff, even when ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~arch is set. First you try for the new
version:
# emerge -va
On Friday 03 of October 2008 04:14:54 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:56:39 -0700
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If pmask is not for testing...what is it for?
The name says it all - to prevent people from automatically emerging
stuff, even when ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~arch is
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:23:33 +0200
Dawid Węgliński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's ok. ~arch isn't training ground. It's supposed to
work, so asking arch teams to keywords packages that are not supposed
to work isn't good.
We have a testing branch and a stable branch, defined by
11 matches
Mail list logo
